DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Te 100
701 S GOURTHOUSE ROAL. SU
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-249(
JET
Docket No. NR5676-1
2 Feb 15
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, consiagerea you?
application on 2 February 2015 Your al Ss
#
3
1. +
Cc
m
ct
t
Qa
mM
=
om
4K
m
K
a
a
oo
=
(D
Os
}
My
147)
()
QO
ty
Ou
J
Qa
D
GG
oO
fay)
ct
4
Oo
‘3
m
nD
La |
oO
3
8
; O
QO
i4))
2
$
K
o
wm
w
i? a
reg plicable
ara Documentarv material consiaer
= O
2
cf
iy
te of the Board's decision.
vidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
s de s
prior to making it
Sc. in this regara,
is important to keep in mind that a presumption
attaches to all official records Consequently
Docket No. NR5676-14
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
LILA A LS xP
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure: CNRC memo 1133 Ser W323 of 22 Oct 14
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11485 14
NGTON, VA 22204-2490 your application o the provisions Cc o A three-member panel Records, sitting ine L e application on 16 December 20 members of the panel will Your allegations of error and in accordance with administrative applicable to the proceedings material considered by the Bo 1 S together with all material su naval record, and applicable ne ae tue a a qa He wage ? we Wat — Wa eoe ame Se LY st te QO SG oO i e in eA} On b- p- a] pe tO Oo 3 Qa OQ RE oom o wy i) 3 -Orcda = Mm mn...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11960 14
BK Qa 20 w f the Board for Correction of Naval executive session, considered your 1 2015. eae a ———— se eee New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11558-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 9) en) 0 ct ty fay =) to Ww CG Oh 4 PR ° Board. OD Oct fe a) K bh Wy HI Q O 5 uw jt M 0 He HO 5 0) 4 ct (D R et 4 Or LQ a ct ie D cat) K = of your oy I i om un ct o a support thereof, your naval recor Pt regulations and policies In addition, the Board con enclosed advisory opinion from Headgq ine Co careful and conscientious consideration of the a 2 Gh . H- B ct ct tn £ K S 2 of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2932 14_Redacted
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRICCTION Or KAVA ROCeCRDS 7ors, COURTHOUSE FOoAeU, SUI 1@a7 te ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 st No: 2932-14 31 October 2014 This is in reference to your applica tien of your naval record pursuant + t of the United ae 4 V6 tates Code, section 15 Although your application was Board found it in the interes limitations and consider your thy ember panel of the Boa é session, he names 4 a) (D m ct © QO O Q aM 2 Ge Cc BK {T i 4 Q) LS) Ce...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14
1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6887 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) THtle 10 U.8
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11957 14
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is -on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR764 14_Redacted
Although your application was not filed in a time Board found it in the interest of justice to wai limitations and consider your application on its three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2015. After consulting with legal counsel, you lected to present your case to an administrative discharge board — (0 94...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14
B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6441 14
Your application claims, “I was eligible to transfer to the Flee. Reserve Pemruary oe 2011. iL was stationed at the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) at the time the Post 9/11 GI (Bjiii was enacted and consulted several individuals prior to electing to transfer to the Fleet Reserve.” Petitioner further claims that “one of those individuals was a person responsible for the approval to transfer eligibility for all Navy members at NPC. This letter states that I had an active duty date obligation...